Tuesday, January 27, 2026

ANGLO-BURUSHO WAR

 

Anglo-Burusho War – Part I

Author: Ashfaq Ahmed Adv

Translation: Ahmed Nayyar

E. F Knight, in his travel narrative Where Three Empires Meet, provides a comprehensive account of Anglo-Burusho War. He recounts that “the princely states of Hunza and Nagar were under the control of absolute monarchs. The royal families of Hunza and Nagar are descended from two brothers who lived in fifteenth century, but they traced their ancestry further back, to a divine origin.” Generally, it was asserted that they were descended from a supernatural deity of the Hindu Kush.

In his book Lords of the Mountains, Harald Hauptmann mentions that “very limited information is available about ancient history and origin of Burusho people. Their true origin remains unclear, as the Brusho have neither written history nor oral traditions that describe their ancient past. They refer to themselves as Brusho. It is believed that either they are ancient indigenous inhabitants of these mountainous regions or the descendants of early migrants who came from Central Asia.”

In the past, tribes of Hunza and Nagar pillage rich caravans enroute from India to Central Asia near the neighborhood of Shahidullah. In Yarqand, the Thums (rulers) have placed a spy who secretly informed them about the movement of trade caravans. It is said that once they have seized valuable goods loaded on fifty camels and five horses.

The Governments of China and Kashmir were unable to stop these raiding activities due to limited administrative capacity. As a result, Hunza and Nagar appear to have cultivated power and dominance among neighboring states and were regarded as invincible. On a certain occasion, a wazir was asked in Thum’s presence, ‘Who is the greatest king of the East?’ And another flattering response followed, “Surely the Thum of Hunza; unless, perhaps, it to be Khan of China; for these without doubt are the two greatest.”

Prior to Colonel Durand’s campaign, there is no recorded mention of defeat in the entire history of Hunza. Likewise, the people have sold a significant number of subjects of Maharaja of Kashmir into slavery in the markets of Central Asia. During this period, Hunza maintained friendly relations with China. The Chinese authorities largely overlooked practices such as slave trading and caravan raiding; at one point, they even permitted a stringent ruler of Hunza to levy taxes on Kirghiz herders in the Taghdumbash Pamir.

Mir Safdar Ali Khan of Hunza and Raja Uzr Khan of Nagar (the heir apparent) established close relations with Russia in response to the expanding British influence in Gilgit-Baltistan. This alignment may be interpreted as an effort to seek protection against the Dogra’s expansion, who had already occupied Baltistan and Gilgit.

It is significant to note that there were thirteen princely states in Gilgit-Baltistan, prior to 1840. Some of these states were subjected to military campaigns by the Khalsa Army during the reign of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Subsequently, the East India Company defeated Ranjit Singh, leading to the collapse of Sikh empire. Following the nonpayment of ransom money, the company sold some of the areas of his empire to General Gulab Singh of Jammu under the agreement of Amritsar in 1846. These territories were transferred in return for a payment of seventy-five lakh rupees, thereby establishing the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Notably, the treaty imposed several conditions on the Maharaja, including the provision of military assistance to the British Empire during times of war.

Previously, Kashmir was consisted of two or three small princely states. Under the Treaty of Amritsar, Gulab Singh became the ruler of Jammu and Kashmir, Kargil, Ladakh, along with present-day Baltistan, and areas including Astore, Bunji, and Gilgit that were incorporated following Khalsa military campaigns after 1840. Following the establishment of the modern state of Jammu and Kashmir, the Dogra rulers undertook several military expeditions against Hunza, Nagar, Yasin, Puniyal, Ghizer, and the tribal regions of Diamer in an effort to expand their frontiers. These attempts, however, were met with strong resistance and ultimately repelled. Therefore, ultimately, British India entrusted Colonel Durand with the responsibility of subjugating Hunza-Nagar.

Simultaneously, British Empire and Tsarist Russia were involved in Great Game. The British government was constantly threatened by Russian forces, fearing that the Russians, traveling through the Pamirs and passing via Hunza-Nagar, Chitral, and Gilgit, might first attack Kashmir and then endanger their monarchy in India. So, they sought to secure the northern frontiers to prevent any potential Russian hostility. For that reason, British India established Imperial Service Regiment, commanded by British officers to defend its frontiers. A company of which was also stationed in Gilgit garrison. In addition, the key objective of forming Gilgit Agency was to stop Russian aggression and protection of British northern frontiers. During the same period, a Russian captain, Gromcheovsky, visited Hunza accompanied by a well-equipped expedition. This development caused major concern within the British government in India, as Russian advances were perceived as a potential strategic threat.    

John Biddulph and Colonel Durand attempted to negotiate with the rulers of Hunza and Nagar; however, these efforts proved unsuccessful. For example, Captain Francis Younghusband, once asked Mir Safdar Ali Khan of Hunza, why he did not visit India, he replied haughtily, “It is not customary for great kings like myself and my ancestor Alexander to leave their own dominions.” Safdar Ali claims that he was descendant of Alexander the great.

It is a historical fact that relatively small yet combatant states of Hunza and Nagar jointly defeated Maharaja Kashmir forces on multiple fronts. They possessed strong confidence in their power and bravery. For instance, in 1848, following the occupation of Gilgit, Colonel Nathu Shah, led a military expedition against Hunza–Nagar. The forces of Hunza–Nagar strongly resisted the invasion, resulting in the killing of Nathu Shah and massacred his whole army. Likewise, again in 1866, the Dogra army of Jammu and Kashmir launched a military expedition against Hunza–Nagar. However, the force suffered a severe defeat and was compelled to retreat, fleeing back to Gilgit. The forces of Hunza-Nagar captured Chalt fort and seized weapons of Maharaja’s troops. E. F Knight deems that this captured weaponry might later be used against them. He further notes that Kanjudis had fostered the impression throughout the valley that Russia was prepared to offer support due to their purportedly friendly relations.     

It should be noted that in contemporary times, the people of Hunza and Nagar often express surprise at the term Kanjudi and, in fact, are mostly unfamiliar with it. In fact, the Chinese authorities and the Uyghur population of Eastern Turkestan referred to the people of Hunza–Nagar as Kanjud. Interestingly, their rivals also employed the term Kanjudis, often in a mocking or derogatory manner. Similarly, the British colonial writers have used Kanjudis to refer to the people of Hunza-Nagar. Kanjudis were known for capturing their enemies and sold them into slavery in the markets of Yarkand.

E. F Knight asserts that Mir Safdar Ali Khan murdered his father and usurped the throne. Similarly, in May 1891, Raja Uzur Khan murdered his two brothers on the allegation that they had friendly relations with the British, whom he perceived as a threat to his authority. He wrote an insolent letter to colonel Durand announcing what he had done.

Meanwhile, reports reached Gilgit that the people of Hunza and Nagar had kidnapped the inhabitants of an area near Chalt and sold in slavery. According to E. F Knight, this unfortunate incident triggered British authorities to change the policy of friendship to hostility. In mid-May, both rulers gathered their forces and advances to capture Chalt fort. After receiving intelligence, Colonel Durand marched with 200 cavalrymen and one British officer toward Chalt to reinforce the garrison. This prompt action thwarted the advance of tribesmen and forced them to withdrawal to their own country. 

However, it seems impossible for Colonel Durand to apprehend rebellious Mir Safdar Ali Khan, who claims to be descendant of Alexander the Great. He only had Dogra Imperial army, which had very recently been organized. It appears that they could not be entirely reliable in the event of war. Specially trained troops were required to fight in these regions, as they needed to be well versed in military strategy suited to diverse terrain, including valleys, gorges, and the Hunza River area. Six thousand troops of the Maharaja were stationed at Gilgit; however, they were not in a condition to fight.  

Against this backdrop, Colonel Durand wrote a letter to British authorities in Shimla to seek assistance. Responding to his request, authorities in Shimla dispatched two hundred Gurkha soldiers and two hill-guns to Gilgit. Similarly, fourteen highly skilled officers with extensive experience in warfare were appointed in Gilgit Agency. In the same way, the Punyal levies extended their support to British because the Rajas of Astor and Punyal were allies with the Empire.    

In this connection, a detailed report was presented in the British parliament to get approval for war against Hunza and Nagar. The report incorporates treaty of 1889 between Thums of Hunza-Nagar and Colonel Durand. Under the treaty they undertook to put an end to the raiding on the Yarkand road and promised to allow properly accredited British officers to travel through their territories when necessary. On the other hand, the British government in India agreed to grant small yearly allowances to both Thums. However, it was not long before the Thums broke the treaty. The Thum of Hunza told Captain Younghusband that unless a larger subsidy was allowed him, he would resume his caravan raids, as that was his legitimate source of income; later on, at a critical time, he would not allow letters to be carried through his territories to Captain Younghusband, then on the Pamirs.

In view of possible attack from Hunza-Nagar, a new fort was constructed at Chalt and a rope bridge was constructed on river Indus at Bunji to facilitate supplies and transportation in winters. Supplies were transported from Kashmir to Astore and then to Gilgit via Bunji. Moreover, an extensive road network was developed from Kashmir to Gilgit and further to Hunza–Nagar and the Hindu Kush passes, employing around 30,000 porters. Nearly 200 personnel engaged in road construction were armed with weapons for self-defense, if necessary. In fact, common citizens became part of the war. Seizure of all roads was the immediate plan, and if the Rajas resisted, the troops would enter their territories. According to E. F Knight, “we should find them a foe not to be despised. 'So far unconquered, they had, on several occasions inflicted defeat on armies composed of some of the best fighting-men in India.”

On the other hand, it was commonly believed among countrymen between Astor and Gilgit that the British force would be annihilated. In such scenario, news spread in Gilgit that Hunza-Nagar had sent their women and children into the mountains. Similarly, a strong force had been assembled at Nilt fort and meditated an immediate attack on Chalt fort. There were also rumors that the tribesmen of Chilas might come to their support. Therefore, the British government cautiously stored supplies in Bunji fort and sent some provisions back to Astor. According to Knight, the local population was undaunted and appeared largely unconcerned with the ongoing conflict; however, many among them expressed sympathy for Hunza and Nagar, a situation that caused deep concern among the British authorities.            

E. F Knight writes that “for our part we were still quite unprepared for an advance in force from Gilgit. Nothing could be done until our commissariat arrangements were complete. Not a tenth of the grain required for the winter supply of the troops had reached Gilgit by the end of October; no greatcoats for the Imperial Service sepoys had yet arrived; there was an insufficiency of boots; there was no ghee; 1,200 coolie-loads of necessary stores were still beyond passes. Matters, indeed, looked serious, and a well-informed and bold enemy might have made it exceedingly uncomfortable for us about this time.”

Nevertheless, instructions were received from Simla headquarters that war should be waged against Hunza-Nagar at the end of the year. Finally, on 16 November 1891, all the armies were camped at Gilgit. According to Knight, at the time of the attack on Hunza-Nagar, 2,000 troops were at the disposal of Colonel Durand. Gilgit looked full of life, and the war was about to begin.


#britishexpedition #hunzanagar #hunza #nagar #campaign #durand #mirsafdaralikhan #rajauzrkhan #gilgit #russia #british #china #chaltfort #niltfort #maiyunfort #india #kashmir #war #astore #bunji #younghusband

 

No comments:

Post a Comment